Author: Mark A. Behrens
| State High Court | Judicial Selection Process | Legal Authority |
|---|---|---|
General
Interim Vacancies
|
Latest News
- 'Bald-faced lies': Jay Mitchell demands retraction from Katherine Robertson for ‘defamatory’ claims - 1819 News
- Alabama GOP’s ‘reckless rush to redistrict’: We dare defend our whites - AL.com
- State Supreme Court severs relationship with progressive American Bar Association and sets cap on bar exams - 1819 News
- Doug Jones says Supreme Court ruling tells voting rights activists their sacrifices don’t matter - AL.com
- States scramble to redistrict after Supreme Court limits Voting Rights Act - CBS News
- Alabama redistricting fight intensifies with primary just weeks away - WVTM
- Alabama, Tennessee GOP governors call special sessions after Supreme Court voting rights ruling - Tippah News
- Alabama, Tennessee GOP governors call special sessions after Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Act decision - MSN
- 'The foundation of representation': Civil Rights legacy meets modern redistricting debate in Alabama - WVTM
- Two more Southern states move toward adding Republican House seats - The Washington Post
Scholarship & White Papers
-
Public Policy Polling
Public Opinion Research
-
Duties to the Unborn: Alabama Supreme Court Deems Viability Irrelevant to Fetal Wrongful-Death Actions
April Mack sued to recover for the wrongful death of her unborn child, who miscarried after a car accident. The Alabama Supreme Court ultimately vindicated her right to recovery, despite her having miscarried her child before the point of viability. In order to do so, the court found that viability made no sense as a prerequisite to wrongful-death recovery, holding an unborn child’s gestational age irrelevant as a matter of law. Conspicuously, the court never saw fit to even mention the U.S. Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence and its treatment of viability.


Supreme Court of Alabama