Author: Mark A. Behrens
State High Court | Judicial Selection Process | Legal Authority |
---|---|---|
General
Interim Vacancies
|
Latest News
- 'Father of IVF': Donald Trump picks new nickname for himself at Women's History Month event, advocates in-vit - Indiatimes.com
- Supreme Court confronts another challenge to the Voting Rights Act - KUOW News and Information
- Halfway to the 2030 census, the Supreme Court is still dealing with lawsuits over the last one - MyNorthwest
- Federal appeals court gives go-ahead for Louisiana’s first nitrogen gas execution - Alabama Reflector
- Alabama Supreme Court sides with doctor, clinics in leg amputation case - AL.com
- Alabama Supreme Court weighs in on dispute between owners of once popular bargain retail chain - AL.com
- Miss America, Supreme Court, Pickleball: Down in Alabama - AL.com
- U.S. Supreme Court reverses state Supreme Court ruling on unemployment suit - Alabama Political Reporter
- Supreme Court Says Alabama’s Exhaustion of State Processes Rule Unlawfully Blocked Due Process Claims - The National Law Review
- ‘Catch-22’: Supreme Court sides with Alabamians suing over unemployment fiasco - AL.com
Scholarship & White Papers
-
Public Policy Polling
Public Opinion Research
-
Duties to the Unborn: Alabama Supreme Court Deems Viability Irrelevant to Fetal Wrongful-Death Actions
April Mack sued to recover for the wrongful death of her unborn child, who miscarried after a car accident. The Alabama Supreme Court ultimately vindicated her right to recovery, despite her having miscarried her child before the point of viability. In order to do so, the court found that viability made no sense as a prerequisite to wrongful-death recovery, holding an unborn child’s gestational age irrelevant as a matter of law. Conspicuously, the court never saw fit to even mention the U.S. Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence and its treatment of viability.