Author: Mark A. Behrens
| State High Court | Judicial Selection Process | Legal Authority |
|---|---|---|
General
Interim Vacancies
|
Latest News
- 2026 Power & Influence – Legacy of Service Award: Honoring Alabama’s most enduring leaders - Yellowhammer News
- Alabama’s top ethics official quits Mabel Amos board after money went to his children: ‘It was not prohibited’ - AL.com
- Mentorship In Action: Potential To Power Nineth-grade Students Visit Supreme Court - Elmore-Autauga News
- Alabama Supreme Court denies condemned killer’s appeal - WAFF
- Alabama Supreme Court to Cops: It's OK To Force a Pastor Watering Flowers To Show His ID - Reason Magazine
- Alabama Supreme Court Expands Police Power to Demand ID From Anyone Who Gives an "Unsatisfactory" Answer - Know Your Rights Camp
- Alabama Supreme Court denies appeal in Madison County murder case - WAFF
- Alabama Supreme Court rules in Kai Spears case regarding source in fatal shooting story - AL.com
- Alabama Supreme Court limits reporter privilege in NY Times lawsuit - Courthouse News
- Birth centers appeal to Alabama Supreme Court in battle with Department of Public Health - Alabama Reflector
Scholarship & White Papers
-
Public Policy Polling
Public Opinion Research
-
Duties to the Unborn: Alabama Supreme Court Deems Viability Irrelevant to Fetal Wrongful-Death Actions
April Mack sued to recover for the wrongful death of her unborn child, who miscarried after a car accident. The Alabama Supreme Court ultimately vindicated her right to recovery, despite her having miscarried her child before the point of viability. In order to do so, the court found that viability made no sense as a prerequisite to wrongful-death recovery, holding an unborn child’s gestational age irrelevant as a matter of law. Conspicuously, the court never saw fit to even mention the U.S. Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence and its treatment of viability.


Supreme Court of Alabama