Author: Mark A. Behrens
| State High Court | Judicial Selection Process | Legal Authority |
|---|---|---|
General
Interim Vacancies
|
Latest News
- Evolution of religious liberty: op-ed by Alabama associate justice Will Sellers - AL.com
- Alabama’s unprecedented no-runoff congressional primary caps chaotic election season - AL.com
- State of Alabama Seeks to Execute Jeremy Williams - Equal Justice Initiative
- Alabama Courthouse Workers Smelled a Rat. Court Must Decide if Insurer Defends Suit - Insurance Journal
- Britt introduces Greg Cook to Senate Judiciary Committee - 1819 News
- Alabama appeals court denies rehearing in death sentence for killing of Mobile PD officer - mynbc15.com
- Alabama Supreme Court extends plaintiffs’ briefing schedule in Tuberville residency suit - Alabama Reflector
- Trump again tries to restrict birthright citizenship after Supreme Court ruling - cbs42.com
- Voting Rights Act commemoration comes with warnings after Supreme Court rulings - Alabama Reflector
- Alabama federal judge nominee Greg Cook dodges 2020 election, Jan. 6 questions - Alabama Daily News
Scholarship & White Papers
-
Public Policy Polling
Public Opinion Research
-
Duties to the Unborn: Alabama Supreme Court Deems Viability Irrelevant to Fetal Wrongful-Death Actions
April Mack sued to recover for the wrongful death of her unborn child, who miscarried after a car accident. The Alabama Supreme Court ultimately vindicated her right to recovery, despite her having miscarried her child before the point of viability. In order to do so, the court found that viability made no sense as a prerequisite to wrongful-death recovery, holding an unborn child’s gestational age irrelevant as a matter of law. Conspicuously, the court never saw fit to even mention the U.S. Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence and its treatment of viability.


Supreme Court of Alabama