Author: Mark A. Behrens
State High Court | Judicial Selection Process | Legal Authority |
---|---|---|
General
Interim Vacancies
|
Latest News
- Gary Palmer calls on U.S. Supreme Court to shield minors from transgender procedures, treatments - Yellowhammer News
- Supreme Court seems likely to uphold Tennessee’s ban on transgender treatments for minors - Alabama Daily News
- Supreme Court hears oral arguments in transgender healthcare case - Alabama Political Reporter
- Conservative justices lean toward allowing Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care - Alabama Reflector
- Attorney General says Alabama is defending kids as SCOTUS weighs gender-affirming care bans - AL.com
- Supreme Court may soon decide fate of gender-affirming care ban for transgender youth in Alabama - AL.com
- U.S. Supreme Court will not review St. Clair capital murder case - Alabama Reflector
- Alabama’s newly elected chief justice: Courts must do more to keep people from going back to prison - AL.com
- RACE CALLED: Alabama Supreme Court Associate Justice Sarah Stewart wins Chief Justice - WHNT News 19
- Sarah Stewart wins Alabama Supreme Court chief justice race - Montgomery Advertiser
Scholarship & White Papers
-
Public Policy Polling
Public Opinion Research
-
Duties to the Unborn: Alabama Supreme Court Deems Viability Irrelevant to Fetal Wrongful-Death Actions
April Mack sued to recover for the wrongful death of her unborn child, who miscarried after a car accident. The Alabama Supreme Court ultimately vindicated her right to recovery, despite her having miscarried her child before the point of viability. In order to do so, the court found that viability made no sense as a prerequisite to wrongful-death recovery, holding an unborn child’s gestational age irrelevant as a matter of law. Conspicuously, the court never saw fit to even mention the U.S. Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence and its treatment of viability.