Authors: Andrew C. Cook, Seth L. Cooper
| State High Court | Judicial Selection Process | Legal Authority |
|---|---|---|
General
Interim Vacancies
|
Latest News
- What role should the Supreme Court play in American politics? - The Washington Post
- Supreme Court to review access to U.S. DOGE Service records - The Washington Post
- FILE PHOTO: The US Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. - The Lufkin Daily News
- US Supreme Court denies bid for pretrial release by anti-ICE activist - Reuters
- US Supreme Court to hear asylum fight involving Nigerian cook - Reuters
- Supreme Court to consider if Nigerian man who cooked for terrorist leaders is ineligible for asylum - PBS
- Washington Supreme Court Rules State Privacy Act Doesn’t Bar Hospital’s Data Share - Mealey's
- Washington Supreme Court Rules State Privacy Act Doesn’t Bar Hospital’s Data Share - Mealey's
- Supreme Court to decide on whether man who cooked for terrorists can claim asylum - Washington Times
- Supreme Court sides with Trump administration in lawsuit seeking records on Elon Musk's DOGE - PBS
Scholarship & White Papers
-
Washington Supreme Court Position 6: A Debate
Pugent Sound Lawyers Chapter, 28 September 2010 – Event Audio/Video
Featuring: Richard B. Sanders, Charlie Wiggins, Peter Callaghan, David K. DeWolf, Stewart Jay
Media & Commentary
-
Washington Supreme Court Rules on Attorney General’s Discretion to Enter Litigation in Two Landmark Cases
The Washington Supreme Court in September issued two of its most highly-anticipated rulings in recent years. Continuing public controversy over federal health care law and the attorney general’s authority to join the states in a multi-state lawsuit challenging the law provided the backdrop to City of Seattle v. McKenna.1 The exercise of the eminent domain power and the attorney general’s discretion in representing state agencies is at issue inGoldmark v. McKenna.2 The pair of rulings addresses the Washington attorney general’s powers under the constitution and laws of Washington State—although opinions written by justices of the court raise their own questions about whether the scope of the attorney general’s powers were addressed consistently.
-
Washington Supreme Court Upholds School Funding Structure: Disparities in School Employee Pay Not Unconstitutional
On November 12, 2009, the Washington State Supreme Court unanimously declined to declare as unconstitutional the state’s educational funding structure.1 The case asked whether the state legislature is constitutionally compelled to equalize state allocations to school districts for school employee salaries.


Washington Supreme Court