Authors: Andrew C. Cook, Seth L. Cooper
| State High Court | Judicial Selection Process | Legal Authority |
|---|---|---|
General
Interim Vacancies
|
Latest News
- The Supreme Court weighs another step in favor of broad presidential power sought by Trump - KWKT - FOX 44
- WA Supreme Court says former YVC basketball player can sue college and coach for sexual abuse - Yakima Herald-Republic
- US Supreme Court may be poised to ditch more of its precedents - Reuters
- Supreme Court will hear case on Trump’s ban on birthright citizenship - The Washington Post
- Supreme Court will rule on Trump's birthright citizenship order - NBC4 Washington
- Supreme Court to decide whether or not Trump’s birthright citizenship order is unconstitutional - New York Post
- Supreme Court agrees to hear Trump’s challenge to birthright citizenship - SCOTUSblog
- Supreme Court will decide whether Trump’s birthright citizenship order violates the Constitution - KFVS12
- Supreme Court to weigh Trump's firing of FTC member in test of presidential power - Reuters
- Public records fight over what WA lawmakers can withhold continues in court - The Seattle Times
Scholarship & White Papers
-
Washington Supreme Court Position 6: A Debate
Pugent Sound Lawyers Chapter, 28 September 2010 – Event Audio/Video
Featuring: Richard B. Sanders, Charlie Wiggins, Peter Callaghan, David K. DeWolf, Stewart Jay
Media & Commentary
-
Washington Supreme Court Rules on Attorney General’s Discretion to Enter Litigation in Two Landmark Cases
The Washington Supreme Court in September issued two of its most highly-anticipated rulings in recent years. Continuing public controversy over federal health care law and the attorney general’s authority to join the states in a multi-state lawsuit challenging the law provided the backdrop to City of Seattle v. McKenna.1 The exercise of the eminent domain power and the attorney general’s discretion in representing state agencies is at issue inGoldmark v. McKenna.2 The pair of rulings addresses the Washington attorney general’s powers under the constitution and laws of Washington State—although opinions written by justices of the court raise their own questions about whether the scope of the attorney general’s powers were addressed consistently.
-
Washington Supreme Court Upholds School Funding Structure: Disparities in School Employee Pay Not Unconstitutional
On November 12, 2009, the Washington State Supreme Court unanimously declined to declare as unconstitutional the state’s educational funding structure.1 The case asked whether the state legislature is constitutionally compelled to equalize state allocations to school districts for school employee salaries.


Washington Supreme Court