Authors: Andrew C. Cook, Seth L. Cooper
| State High Court | Judicial Selection Process | Legal Authority |
|---|---|---|
General
Interim Vacancies
|
Latest News
- Washington Supreme Court To Hear Moses Lake Farmer’s Water-Rights Appeal - Source ONE News
- Supreme Court Backs Maker of Generic Heart Drug in 'Skinny Label' Case - MedPage Today
- US Supreme Court backs generic drugmaker in 'skinny label' patent case - Reuters
- Supreme Court sides with President Donald Trump administration on federal regulation of telecom companies - Chicago Tribune
- Washington Supreme Court to hear Grant County farmer’s appeal - Capital Press
- Supreme Court upholds broad reading of SEC authority to recoup ill-gotten gains in fraud cases - Daily Press
- Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on federal regulation of telecom companies - The Winchester Star
- Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on federal regulation of telecom companies - MyNorthwest.com
- Supreme Court upholds broad reading of SEC authority to recoup ill-gotten gains in fraud cases - MyNorthwest.com
- Supreme Court rules against Verizon, AT&T over privacy penalties - The Center Square
Scholarship & White Papers
-
Washington Supreme Court Position 6: A Debate
Pugent Sound Lawyers Chapter, 28 September 2010 – Event Audio/Video
Featuring: Richard B. Sanders, Charlie Wiggins, Peter Callaghan, David K. DeWolf, Stewart Jay
Media & Commentary
-
Washington Supreme Court Rules on Attorney General’s Discretion to Enter Litigation in Two Landmark Cases
The Washington Supreme Court in September issued two of its most highly-anticipated rulings in recent years. Continuing public controversy over federal health care law and the attorney general’s authority to join the states in a multi-state lawsuit challenging the law provided the backdrop to City of Seattle v. McKenna.1 The exercise of the eminent domain power and the attorney general’s discretion in representing state agencies is at issue inGoldmark v. McKenna.2 The pair of rulings addresses the Washington attorney general’s powers under the constitution and laws of Washington State—although opinions written by justices of the court raise their own questions about whether the scope of the attorney general’s powers were addressed consistently.
-
Washington Supreme Court Upholds School Funding Structure: Disparities in School Employee Pay Not Unconstitutional
On November 12, 2009, the Washington State Supreme Court unanimously declined to declare as unconstitutional the state’s educational funding structure.1 The case asked whether the state legislature is constitutionally compelled to equalize state allocations to school districts for school employee salaries.


Washington Supreme Court