Campaign Activity

Thielemann, Gregory S. “Local Advantage in Campaign Financing: Friends, Neighbors, and their Money in Texas Supreme Court Elections,” 55 Journal of Politics 472 (1993). (JStor)

December 20, 2011

This article argues that Key’s concept of “friends and neighbors” politics, which uses the phenomenon of localism to explain voting behaviors, should be extended into the realm of campaign finance.

Streb, Matthew J., ed., “Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections,” New York: New York University Press (2007). (Amazon)

December 20, 2011

Schotland, Roy A. “Elective Judges’ Campaign Financing: Are State Judges’ Robes the Emperor’s Clothes of American Democracy,” 2 Journal of Law and Politics 57 (1988).

December 20, 2011

This article outlines several problems inherent in current judicial campaign financing systems and proposes ways to reform those systems.

Peters, C. Scott. “Campaigning for State Supreme Court, 2006,” 29 Justice System Journal 166 (2008).

December 20, 2011

This article reports the results of a survey of candidates who ran in state supreme court elections in 2006 and suggests that candidates’ campaign organizations rely largely on volunteer labor rather than paid staff or consultants, and that parties and interest groups play a limited role in campaign organization.

Peters, C. Scott. “Canons, Cost, and Competition in State Supreme Court Elections,” 91 Judicature 27 (2007).

December 20, 2011

This article analyzes the effects of different rules that restrict spending for judicial candidates in terms of their impact on both the cost of elections and their level of competition.

Hall, Melinda Gann, and Chris W. Bonneau. “Mobilizing Interest: The Effects of Money on Citizen Participation in State Supreme Court Election,” 52 American Journal of Political Science 3, 457 (2008). (JStor)

December 20, 2011

This empirical study gathers data from 260 supreme court elections held from 1990–2004 to show that greater campaign spending increases voter participation.

Gibson, James L. “‘New-Style’ Judicial Campaigns and the Legitimacy of State High Courts,” 71 Journal of Politics 4, 1285 (2009).

December 20, 2011

This article relies upon an experiment embedded within a representative national survey to conclude that the legitimacy of elected state courts is threatened not by the exercise of the free speech rights extended to candidates  for judicial office in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, but by campaign contributions.

Gibson, James L. “Challenges to the Impartiality of State Supreme Courts: Legitimacy Theory and ‘New-Style’ Judicial Campaigns,” 102 American Political Science Review 1, 59 (2008).

December 20, 2011

This article presents survey data indicating that while campaign contributions and attack ads in judicial elections threaten the legitimacy of courts, policy pronouncements do not.

Gibson, James L. “Campaigning for the Bench: The Corrosive Effects of Campaign Speech?” 42 Law and Society Review 899 (2008). (SSRN)

December 20, 2011

This article uses post hoc and experimental methods to assess whether public perceptions of courts are influenced by various sorts of campaign activity and concludes that different types of campaign activity (e.g. policy pronouncements and policy promises) have very different consequences.

Frederick, Brian, and Matthew J. Streb. “Paying the Price for a Seat on the Bench: Campaign Spending in Contested State Intermediate Appellate Court Elections,” 8 State Politics and Policy Quarterly 410 (2008). (Sage)

December 20, 2011

This empirical study examines the factors that predicted campaign spending in 172 contested state intermediate appellate court races from 2000–2006 and finds that the characteristics of the race, institutional factors, and the context of the campaign are all relevant.